Certified posh trainer in India

71% of women fail to report incidences of sexual harassment at work , according to a 2015 survey. Only 68.9% of Indian women who experience sexual harassment report their experiences to the Internal Committee (IC) or management, according to a 2017 survey by the Indian National Bar Association (INBA). Retaliation is a tactic used to ridicule, humiliate, and spread rumours about the sexual harassment victim. When an employee reports sexual harassment in the workplace, the company may take action against them. Retaliation is any negative employment action that involves " exerting power ." Demotion, wage reduction, job transfer, and termination are a few examples. For fear of retaliation, many women choose not to report sexual harassment at work. The victim may be the target of reprisals from the accused or the organisation. In fact, studies has shown that businesses frequently devalue sexual harassment. As a result, the victim faces hostility and reprisals. The organization'

More than 27000 transgender people participated in a poll in 2015, and the results showed that at least 77% of them actively avoided workplace discrimination . This includes keeping their gender identities a secret, declining to request the use of their preferred pronouns by their employers and coworkers, and postponing gender transition. Transgender individuals might not be fully present at work. Because they are more likely than cisgender employees to have an uneven working environment, they could feel uneasy or alienated. Companies should begin implementing nondiscriminatory rules and procedures that are gender-specific. This entails regardless of their gender identities, defending and advancing the rights of every employee Increasing employee awareness of and acceptance of their transgender coworkers. To some extent, everyone needs to feel like they belong. It's common for us to evaluate our relationships subconsciously. We experience poor levels of self-esteem and unfavorable

In today's workplace, fostering a safe, respectful, and inclusive environment is paramount. The Prevention of Sexual Harassment (Posh) at Workplace Act, enacted in India in 2013, is a significant legislative step towards ensuring such an environment. It mandates organizations to take proactive measures in preventing, prohibiting, and redressing sexual harassment at the workplace. One of the most effective ways to comply with this legislation and cultivate a positive workplace culture is through comprehensive Posh law training for employees. Why Posh Law Training is Essential Legal Compliance The Posh Act requires every organization with ten or more employees to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) and conduct regular training sessions. Failure to comply can result in hefty penalties, damage to the organization's reputation, and a loss of trust among employees. Awareness and Sensitivity Training helps employees understand what constitutes sexual harassment, the imp

In a significant ruling that reinforced the importance of implementing the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act in its true spirit, the Allahabad High Court delivered a decisive judgment in the case of Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021). This judgment emphasized that the non-compliance or delay in constituting an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) by an organization is a serious violation of the Act and infringes upon the fundamental rights of employees. The Crux of the Case The case arose from a writ petition filed by Sanjeev Kumar, an employee of the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (UPPCL), who alleged that despite repeated requests, the organization had failed to constitute an ICC as mandated by the POSH Act. Kumar contended that this non-compliance not only violated the provisions of the Act but also infringed upon the fundamental rights of employees, including their right to a safe and secure work environment. The Allahabad High Court's Ruling In it

In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court delivered a resounding verdict that extended the applicability of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act to government organizations, including constitutional bodies like the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). The case of Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. Comptroller & Auditor General of India (2018) was a pivotal moment in ensuring that the principles of the POSH Act are upheld across all spheres of employment, irrespective of the nature or status of the organization. The Crux of the Case The case arose from a petition filed by Saurabh Kumar Mallick, an Assistant Audit Officer employed with the CAG, who alleged that he had been subjected to sexual harassment by a superior officer. Mallick claimed that despite filing a formal complaint, the CAG failed to take appropriate action or constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) as mandated by the POSH Act. The CAG, in its defense, argued that as a constitutional body, it w

In today's interconnected world, the rise of digital communication has brought numerous benefits, but it has also given rise to new challenges, including online harassment. In this article, we explore a hypothetical case study involving online harassment in the workplace and discuss the importance of proactive measures to protect employees in the digital age. Case Study 5: Online Harassment Scenario: David, a marketing manager, finds himself the target of online harassment as he receives explicit messages and inappropriate photos from a coworker via social media platforms. Despite his discomfort and attempts to ignore the harassment, the unwanted communication continues, leaving David feeling distressed and vulnerable. Response: Online harassment presents unique challenges for employers and employees alike. Here's how organizations can respond effectively to instances of online harassment: Take Immediate Action: The first step for employees facing online harassment, like Da